Head of Compliance Jarret Brown comments in City AM on the landmark ruling in Mazur and Stuart v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, in which the High Court clarified that only individuals personally authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority may conduct litigation – even when employed by a regulated firm.

Jarret’s comments were published in City AM, 9 October 2025.

“The reality is that many volume and legal aid firms rely on non-authorised staff to conduct litigation under an authorised person’s supervision to remain commercially viable – something the High Court has now confirmed is not permitted. This took place with the SRA’s knowledge. In that context, it would seem harsh and impractical for the SRA to take retrospective action against such firms.

“The key question now is whether the SRA will take action in the future. It also remains uncertain where the boundary falls between supporting an authorised person conducting litigation and effectively conducting litigation under their supervision. Clear SRA guidance is urgently needed to ensure firms stay compliant.”

Stokoe news header - London

28 May 2026

Partner Richard Cannon comments on UK sanctions targeting crypto networks, in New Law Journal

READ MOREREAD MORE

Stokoe news header - police car

06 May 2026

Partner Richard Cannon comments on post-Brexit extradition hurdles, in The Independent

READ MOREREAD MORE

Related News

Stokoe news header - London

28 May 2026

Partner Richard Cannon comments on UK sanctions targeting crypto networks, in New Law Journal

Stokoe news header - police car

06 May 2026

Partner Richard Cannon comments on post-Brexit extradition hurdles, in The Independent

Stokoe news header - bank

05 May 2026

Partner Amjid Jabbar examines reforms to the confiscation regime, in The Law Society Gazette